The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Since there's no substantial edits to the article aside from Tristan benedict's, I'm going to enterpret his comment as a db-author request. Further note to Tristan benedict, if you later decide to recreate the same article, it's likely to be nominated for deletion again Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:46, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary, unreferenced and frankly inaccurate article (it wasn't the British Army for a start). Serves only an umbrella for two extant articles which are already well entrenched in Wikipedia, and easily accessible. I say delete. —Cliftonian (talk) 03:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]