The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted by Lectonar as nonsense. Stifle (talk) 11:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mathew dibble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article is likely a hoax or a joke. The article is, at any rate, unsourced and unverifiable, and may be defamatory. There is no text worth saving. Richard Cavell (talk) 11:17, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete G1 (for which it had already been nominated?) Fiddle Faddle (talk) 11:20, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.