The result was delete. Tone 14:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Semi-advertorialized WP:AUTOBIO of a filmmaker, not making any strong claim to passage of WP:CREATIVE or citing any particularly strong reliable sources to secure notability per WP:GNG. The most visible attempt at a notability claim here is that one of his films won a minor "Best Short Film" award at a science fiction convention -- but "notable because award" for a filmmaker requires important awards on the order of the Oscars or the BAFTAs or the Canadian Screen Awards that get media coverage, not just any small fry film award that can be "referenced" solely to its own self-published content about itself because real media journalism about the award ceremony is non-existent. And other than that, this is firmly in "notable because his work exists" territory, which still requires real sources. But the referencing here is almost entirely to directly affiliated primary sources -- the only real media references shown at all are a dead link that never actually provided the proper citation details in order for us to retrieve it and verify what it did or didn't say; one short blurb in a magazine which namechecks his existence without being about him to any non-trivial degree; and one wire service article which isn't enough all by itself if it's the only substantive source on offer. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this.
Note that Wikipedia's notability and sourcing standards have been tightened up considerably in the past decade, precisely because the standards of the early 2010s left us too vulnerable to spammy self-promotion — so the fact that the first discussion closed as a "keep" is not a permanent injunction against reconsidering it now. Consensus can change, after all. Bearcat (talk) 01:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)