The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Keep - I can find no reliable news sources that discuss the subject of this article. There are many references made to the beach by websites about beaches (specifically Cape Cod). I consider those to be third parties that have no interest (monitary) on promoting this location. [WP:RS] doesn't specifically address this situation (that I can find) so I'm going with my gut here. If that many websites on beaches reference this beach, it seems notable to me.OlYellerTalktome01:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The books found via Google Books don't rate this beach too highly, only briefly mentioning it, and giving it two stars, while numerous other locations get more.Also, according to this book, [1], the book is 1200 feet. If beaches are typically measured by their length, then it is definitely a geographic feature of some significance. If it is 1200 ft. squared, then it is about 0.0208% the size of an American football playing field, and not that significant. Unless of course, any beach is inherently notable regardless of size, in which case, I will withdraw my nomination. --Patar knight - chat/contributions23:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I found information on this beach easily enough; all the article needs is a little cleanup and some information added to it, maybe a picture. Ks64q2 (talk) 04:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.