The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne City Rooftop Honey

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional page for trivial local project. DGG ( talk ) 02:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ten beehives and some local coverage does seem a bit trivial. Borock (talk) 04:24, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete the media coverage merely confirms existence. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 10:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:39, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:39, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:40, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, urban apiaries are pretty cool, but there does not seem to be the sort of third-party coverage one would need to see for this to meet the WP:GNG. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:30, 28 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.