- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:12, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Mental Potentials Create Many Realities or Many Worlds[edit]
- Mental Potentials Create Many Realities or Many Worlds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite an extensive search for coverage in reliable sources, I am unable to find enough significant reliable coverage for the book. I found only two pages specifically discussing the book, neither of which appear to be reviews or otherwise enough to establish notability. The remaining hits I can find are brief websites or sites selling the book. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Hi..OK.
The book is only referenced by Google Books and an unofficial Facebook page ... both referenced by Ingram Books. How much more coverage is needed? Are reviews needed?
- The article needs significant coverage in reliable sources. This could mean news articles, reviews, etc. User-generated reviews on websites such as Google Books are generally not considered reliable. Please read WP:RS for more information. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC).Reply[reply]
- Delete as I also concur there's nothing establishing actual notability especially since it's simply a newly published book which has imaginably not established itself with substance, hence delete. SwisterTwister talk 04:16, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Delete. I wish the author well, but the book just doesn't pass notability guidelines at this point in time. I can't find anything to show notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:03, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Delete (is it SNOWING?), the only thing the author doesn't suggest is a mind-driven perpetual motion machine, though I might have missed it after falling asleep on page 3. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Delete. Utter balderdash. — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 20:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:41, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi...I have already submitted the manuscript for this book to the Vanderbilt Special Collections Library. Can you tell me the best way to have a summary ... on the book ... posted on Wikipedia for public viewing? I also deal with hallucinatioms and mental illness. Sorry for any inconvenience. The book is extremely important. Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Luckerkd (talk • contribs) 21:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Unfortunately in order for the book to have a summary on Wikipedia the book would have to pass NBOOK, which is extremely hard for self-published books to pass. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:50, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.