The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Amkgp 💬 15:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Metropark Hotel Causeway Bay Hong Kong[edit]

Metropark Hotel Causeway Bay Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This hotel is WP:Run-of-the-mill and fails WP:NBUILD and WP:GNG Wikiwriter700 (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - could be expanded significantly using the sources here Spiderone 10:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. Orton, Toby. "Fodor's Expert Review: Metropark Hotel Causeway Bay". Fodor's. Archived from the original on 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16.
  2. "【港區國安法】香港仲有邊啲中資酒店? 中旅持有維景酒店成國安公署臨時基地". Hong Kong Economic Times (in Chinese). 2020-07-08. Archived from the original on 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16.
  3. "公署圖則禁查閱 屋署：屬藝術品". Ming Pao (in Chinese). 2020-07-09. Archived from the original on 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16.
  4. Mok, Maisy (2020-07-08). "Hotel turned into security office". The Standard. Archived from the original on 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16.
  5. Wong, Rachel (2020-07-19). "When Big Brother moved in next door: How Chinese state security brought fear to a Hong Kong neighbourhood". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16.
  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Metropark Hotel Causeway Bay Hong Kong to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 01:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Cunard; there are enough sources covering this; article needs improving but not deleting Spiderone 08:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I believe this article can be improved with the many sources that Cunard has listed above. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 08:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep WP:Run-of-the-mill is an essay and "Essays have no official status, and do not speak for the Wikipedia community". Andrew🐉(talk) 11:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep (and improve, sure) — I note that the nominator has been proposing AfD on numerous articles on hotels (I can't help wondering why?), always on the basis of the run-of-the-mill argument, which in some cases does indeed apply (FWIW); IMO, it does not here. Alone the takeover of this hotel by the spooks makes it interesting and notable. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.