The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article can be restored to draftspace if more reliable, secondary sourcing is unearthed. czar 04:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael McCavish[edit]

Michael McCavish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable aikido instructor. None of the sources given indicate the notability required in WP:BIO, and I couldn't find any better ones. Fram (talk) 15:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I know, the Shodokan Aikido world championships are held in odd-numbered years and have never been held in Virginia. Is my info incorrect? If you have independent coverage showing he was a world champion, it would help his case for notability. Papaursa (talk) 04:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Since it wasn't an actual world championship event it doesn't carry the same weight. I also don't know how American Manny Vargas could have been the reigning world champion for this event in 2000 when it's claimed the first non-Japanese world champion was in 2003[1]. It does appear he was part of the Japanese team that won a team event in 2003, but being a team champion in an individual sport is less impressive to me--especially when it appears all competitors were from either the BAA or JAA. The article doesn't show any significant independent coverage of him and my own search didn't find any. I'm withholding my vote for now, in the hopes that additional coverage can be shown. Papaursa (talk) 03:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 18:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane talk 01:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 12:54, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.