The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this article for User:Yankees10, who asked me to nominate it instead of doing it himself for some reason. Eagles24/7(C) 00:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Moore does not satisfy WP:ATH yet, but may satisfy it when the draft comes around in April. Eagles24/7(C) 01:24, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- There's not much now, and "may meet it in the future" doesn't help. If/when he does meet either the GNG or WP:ATHLETE, no prejudice against re-creation. Umbralcorax (talk) 01:34, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We don't judge an article on how notable the person may be in the future, that's crystal ball-ing. If he is drafted in the first round and/or makes a team's roster, then he is notable. Grsz11 02:03, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:ATH. He may be notable by April, but right now that's WP:CRYSTAL. I recommend no prejudice against a re-creation in the future. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 20:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Move to the creators userspace, as this can be later notable. Armbrust (talk) 14:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - BTW, I have already moved it to my userspace. Eagles24/7(C) 20:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.