The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Webster (ice hockey)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG by only WP:ROUTINE sources. Won a minor leadership award in the OHL but no preeminent honors to qualify for WP:NHOCKEY criterion #4. Yosemiter (talk) 19:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the GNG or our inclusion criteria for hockey players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker ^talk 02:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Amateur player of no particular accomplishments; fails NHOCKEY, no sources which satisfy the GNG. Ravenswing 20:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.