- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 09:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Michele Carlson[edit]
- Michele Carlson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
GNG and WP:ARTIST fail. She has been fairly widely published as an author of magazine articles (see ext links section), but there is scant coverage, if any, that deals with her or her work. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep: editor of Art Practice online art magazine, notable enough to have passed the eagle eye of Randykitty, seems to push towards notability.PamD
- I see where you are going there, but editing a web magazine or being looked over by particular editor are not policy-based arguments for keeping an article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 12:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No RS and checking just showed lots of web stuff. Weak claim to notability and orphan. Agricola44 (talk) 15:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Virtually nothing as far as reliable sourcing goes. Curiocurio (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 22:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.