The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:42, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Nerren[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local judge who fails WP:NPOL. Pinging non-banned, non-IP voters in last AFD @WilliamJE: @Power~enwiki: @Mike Christie: Reywas92^Talk 05:59, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:26, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:26, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:27, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails to Pass WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO Lubbad85 (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The last keep basically was built by people who consistently go against policy and try to argue every local politician is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:52, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable local judge....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.