- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:36, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Mildred C. Crump (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
City councilwoman, fails WP:POLITICIAN Rusf10 (talk) 23:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. City councillors do not get an automatic inclusion freebie per WP:NPOL just for existing, but qualify for articles only if they have a strong claim to being significantly more notable than most other city councillors in most other cities — but this is not substanced or sourced even remotely close to well enough to demonstrate that. Bearcat (talk) 18:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.