The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:25, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Military history of Asia

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know if an article actually could be written about this topic, it seems very broad. Regardless, the current article serves no purpose, it is nothing more than just a list of various Asian empires. Rusf10 (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, with related article added. Article's contents are not actually topics under this title; while this very broad topic could conceivably be made into a recreated article, this is not even a starting point or useful to a reader. Reywas92^Talk 04:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per nom and WP:TNT. The topics could be outline articles, but there's little to nothing worth salvaging here. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I also endorse deletion of the second article.--Rusf10 (talk) 05:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both articles as the topics are too broad to be usefully discussed, as the creator demonstrated by not discussing them. Mccapra (talk) 06:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. Nothing more than an unsourced topic list at this point. Johnnie Bob (talk) 13:24, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 19:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Maybe this could've been written as a disambiguation page or something, but in its current form it just doesn't work as a way to organize our content. ((u|Sdkb)) ^talk 22:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no need for this page, too broad, nothing to see or salvage from this article. SunDawn (talk) 07:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.