The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Glam India 2016 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Poorly sourced article about this year's running of a beauty pageant of unclear notability; there isn't even an main overview article about the pageant to justify separate articles about each annual iteration of it yet. And for referencing, what we have here is a Facebook post, the primary source webpage of a related pageant and a WordPress blog -- exactly none of which are reliable sources that can confer notability. I would ordinarily have speedied this, but this is actually a followup recreation after an earlier version was speedied for not making a credible claim of notability. As always, Wikipedia is not a free platform to write Facebook-sourced articles about every single thing that existed at all -- reliable source coverage, making a credible claim of notability that would satisfy WP:NEVENT, is required for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 17:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:14, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:14, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable pageant....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Anup [Talk] 19:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable enough to justify an article for a competition in a given year.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since Miss Glam India does not exits; no reason to have an article on a specific year for a series that may not be notable itself. Sources are clearly insufficient to meet GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.