The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Intercontinental pageant[edit]

Miss Intercontinental pageant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable contest. No independent sources in many years and nothing obvious in google. Over the four winners with articles, only Hannelly Quintero is clearly sufficiently sourced. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Panama-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 09:56, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Just not enough information out there to meet WP:Notability guidelines. I even tried to establish notability through the parent organization “World Beauty Organization" and sorry to say they do not meet guidelines. ShoesssS ^Talk 12:55, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:44, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Hmm, I'm not convinced of notability either. The creator never came back to the article or Wikipedia after posting it back in 2010. If this is deleted, we should delete its dependent pages Miss Intercontinental country rankings, Miss Intercontinental History, and Miss Intercontinental winners too. All of which were created by problematic editors - one blocked for threatening behaviour/sockpuppetry, and the other has only edited pages related to Miss Intercontinental - suspiciously similar editing behaviour to another editor with a fixation/apparent conflict of interest on the deleted/salted Miss Supranational. Not saying this is the same editor, just that the editing behaviour seems similar. But back to topic - yeah, no real evidence of notability and probably created solely for promo purposes/publicity to try and legitimise this pageant. Mabalu (talk) 11:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'll bundle those together in a separate AFD - there's quite a lot of unreferenced/unsourced Miss Intercontinental bumph on here. Even if this manages to survive AFD, the bumph fails notability in its own right. Mabalu (talk) 11:39, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Intercontinental winners For info. Mabalu (talk) 12:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Intercontinental. postdlf (talk) 02:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.