The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 12:41, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss International country rankings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fancruft based on related sources The Banner talk 22:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: There are so many, many reasons: Wikipedia is not random information. There is no notability to a table of countries competing (which they don't) in beauty pageants (which aren't competitive sports), much less this particular one, which doesn't have outstanding notability, either. Hithladaeus (talk) 02:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This isn't like an Olympics medal table or ATP tennis rankings, which are widely published in media. This is just something somebody made up one day. It's not notable of itself, it's original research, it's a bunch of stats (WP:NOTSTATSBOOK), it's not especially useful. The main article can say who has had the most winners and other very important statistics, but not this much detail. Colapeninsula (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.