The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 07:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miss U.S. International 2017

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable pageant events, no evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason. This pageant has not achieved a level of notability to support individual event articles. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 01:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all: Zero evidence of notability. This appears to be a scam, with an entry fee of $595.00 and a prize consisting of "Rhinestone trimmed Sash and Crown (a $300.00 value)" for the one person who wins.[1] The person who created all of these pages is a very active sockpuppeteer; See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnnLivinova/Archive. We should also MfD Template:Miss U.S. International. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all: As much as there might be someone that might want to keep the articles a criteria for inclusion is the notability of the subject. "Primary sources are original materials that are close to an event, and are often accounts written by people who are directly involved.". On WP:BLP's editors are to avoid misuse of primary sources. "Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.". Otr500 (talk) 05:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Are these related to Miss U.S. International? And either way, why wouldn't these titles make for useful redirects? czar 20:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as spam & promotional campaign. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.