The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:07, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miss USA 2016 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No date or venue yet and mostly no reliable sources, article created too soon. Cheetah255 (talk) 18:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete like the other pageant articles this user created for 2016. Legacypac (talk) 18:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: As it will take place within 12 months. However, only on the condition reliable sources are found. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:35, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Lacking date, venue and reliable source coverage as the nominator states. The sources mentioned in the previous AfD discussion don't even mention the 2016 pageant. The references in the article either don't confirm date and venue or are unreliable (Angelopedia). • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No venue or date has been confirmed. Soulseek324 (talk) 22:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC) struck !vote of a sockpuppet - they edited a number of AfD pages in addition to the one the sockpuppetry concerned, aparrently in a bid to make the sockpuppetry less conspicuous. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Turquoisesummer RichardOSmith (talk) 08:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• DElete Article created by a now blocked puppetmaster and edited by one of his sockpuppets, making the article in fact unreliable. Especially in combination with the lack of reliable sources conform WP:RS The Banner talk 11:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete  Lots of problems, including future tense.  Removing the banned contributions would be difficult.  If editors want to get started before the event takes place, we have Draft: space.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for now, as there's very little information from reliable sources right now, so it's too soon. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.