The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)SL93 (talk) 22:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mitchell Waite[edit]

Mitchell Waite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage, there is none in the article, and it reads like an advertisement. A PROD was contested in 2013. SL93 (talk) 01:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • You have definitely shown notability. I wish I could withdraw this, but I can't with three prior deletes. SL93 (talk) 23:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It appears one of the editors changed their mind. Perhaps if we contact the other two editors and ask them to weigh in? I'm also willing to work on improving the article with the citations and other info I've found if the article is kept. SouthernNights (talk) 14:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I've now cleaned up the article and added new info and citations. Also, Waite's life and work is heavily featured in a large section of the book Code Nation: Personal Computing and the Learn to Program Movement in America. I've added info from this to the article. That book makes a strong case that Waite was instrumental through his books in encouraging the "rapid development of the Mac platform in the 1980s." SouthernNights (talk) 15:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The new sources added from the 1990s help improve the article, we have enough to show notability now. Oaktree b (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.