The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Probably G12 (really needs some better investigation to discover if we took from the other sources, or if they took from us). In any case, consensus is clearly to delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Royal Fashion

[edit]
Modern Royal Fashion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a case of WP:NOTESSAY even though it is well written Gbawden (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under G12. I see no use in trying to clean this up. --Lockley (talk) 18:46, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Having a look at Google Books, there seems to be a few books specifically on the topic, and plenty of articles as cited. A lot of interest in the Royals, and they do have specific norms and culture with what they wear. Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.