The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MoneyConf[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable event. Significant RS coverage not found; article is cited to passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP sources. For a related AfD, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collision Conference. This article is similar in concept and execution and should be likewise deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:47, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The first five citations have nothing to do with the subject itself, and the last three are primary sources. The remaining source isn't enough to establish the event's notability. Delete. Alexius08 (talk) 03:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bobherry Talk Edits 13:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.