The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Penn Radio. MBisanz ^talk 08:35, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey Tuesday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Massive amount of unsourced fancruft that's loaded with weasel words, overinflated claims, and doesn't appear to have any notability whatsoever independent of Penn Radio. Deserves a paragraph in that article, maybe, certainly no more than that. Chardish (talk) 14:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for failure to establish notability. Eddie.willers (talk) 15:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I'd never heard of this radio station or the day, but I found the article interesting and amusing. There is obviously far too much material to have any significant merge into the radio station's article. Article needs citations and could stand to use some serious chopping, but on the whole I think it is good enough to have its own article. TastyCakes (talk) 15:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since this is entirely unreferenced fancruft. TastyCakes, it may be interesting and fun, but there is no coverage of this at all. "Article needs citations" is a serious understatement. Drmies (talk) 17:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. For this, I call WP:NEO. Maybe Penn Gillette came up with it on his radio show, but that seems to be the only sourcing of this, is a radio show by Penn Gillette. I find it interesting, if anything, that we have much in the way of weasel words in an article about something vaguely related to primates. --63.64.30.2 (talk) 17:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: notability not established, neologism. JamesBurns (talk) 04:40, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note – This user has been blocked for sock puppetry and vote-stacking at AfDs. List of Confirmed sock puppets of User:JamesBurns Untick (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]
• Delete Like TastyCakes, I was amused by this article. But it's not Tuesday and no references support its notability. Hazir (talk) 05:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Slight merge and redirect to Penn Radio. While the current coverage is somewhat excessive, there is no reason why something closer to the length of this version couldn't be merged to the main article, and there is no reason not to have a redirect for this plausible search term. DHowell (talk) 04:51, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Nom seems to be based on issues that can be fixed by editing, and policy is that we shouldn't delete stuff we can fix. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.