The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:HEY and the withdraw of the nomination. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monsooned Malabar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like an ad for a variety of coffee bean; unsourced and has a long history of spamming, etc. but want full input from the community Orange Mike | Talk 16:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete Stub, unsourced and no links to it? Delete. --WngLdr34 (talk) 16:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 18:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep 20 Gscholar studies, 52 Gbooks coverage pieces, 97 Gnews coverage pieces for a variety of coffee beans. Can easily be referenced. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 18:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep after the excellent rewrite with sourcing by SpacemanSpiff. Nice rescue! Abecedare (talk) 00:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Well referenced now. Salih (talk) 08:47, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdrawn - the article as it stands is not the article I nominated, nor the spam which it replaced. Withdrawn. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:34, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.