The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Pietro Lorenzetti. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monticchiello Altarpiece

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Although I couldn't access it, the article is based on 1 catalog entry, which seems to me to violate WP:NOTDATABASE. Moreover, why do we even have an article on something theoretical, i.e. all just someone's assumptions, speculation. In particular, the "Possible reconstruction" is misleading. While the painter is famous, that doesn't automatically make all his works notable. A cursory Google search turns up mirrors or copies of this article. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the painter.TheLongTone (talk) 14:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Pietro Lorenzetti, could easily be a one or two line listing in his article here. Oaktree b (talk) 14:10, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Waiting for fuller research and for someone who can access the link. This must have a reason for linking these paintings together. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They were probably cut up at one point from a larger alterpiece. It wasn't uncommon for art to be split up among soldiers after a conquest; who knows in this case. Oaktree b (talk) 19:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Pietro Lorenzetti article which has no mention of this altarpiece. Lamona (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would expect that anyone commenting here would base their opinions on sources, such as the ones found by clicking on "scholar" above. Why do we link to searches when nobody seems to take any notice of the results? And a "cursory Google search" for a work by a medieval artist? Don't people realise that the World Wide Web didn't exist 700 years ago? Phil Bridger (talk) 09:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Redirect to the creator Pietro_Lorenzetti, Lacks in depth sources. Surya^beej ^⋠talk⋡ 13:19, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Q.E.D. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well Clearly there ain't strong in depth sources available to state the Notability factor of the Art Work but the Artist is Notable thus its should be Merged or Redirected. Infact the only Source [1] This which is there in the Article doesn't opens. Surya^beej ^⋠talk⋡ 09:12, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.