The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TravellingCari 23:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monument Policy Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Lobbying groups that likely fails WP:ORG. The only references I could find were related to the hires and offices of the organization or short blurps by one of the group's partners. I could not find and good sources that talked about the Monument Policy Group itself. Full disclosure: I have prodded all four partners of the group. Millbrooky (talk) 00:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Possible sources only treat the subject trivially. No significant coverage. Jeremiah (talk) 20:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per Jeremiah - the sources have trivia coverage. While they lobby for very notable organizations, that's not much of an assertion. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 02:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per Jeremiah Dlohcierekim 00:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.