The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Movandi[edit]

Movandi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable small company in its early stages; minor awards only, no significant independent references. DGG ( talk ) 05:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, all coverage appears to be aspirational business press, nothing that meets WP:ORGCRITE. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:56, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.