The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moviesplanet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability requirements for WP:WEB. Reads like an advertisement except for criticism section. Only third-party sources are one Israeli periodical (that I can't read). Otherwise, only primary source of website itself. Bbb23 (talk) 15:11, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete might be speedy deleteable via A7, no claim of notability RadioFan (talk) 01:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonnotable website. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:50, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable - TBloemink (talk) 13:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, There are plenty of sources to cover notability. Haaretz is one of the biggest and most reliable newspapers in Israel, there's also a mention from The Sydney Morning Herald - both sources in English. Orlydumitrescu (talk) 19:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The Sydney Morning Herald article cited in the article doesn't even mention Moviesplanet. The Haaretz article has to do with a legal controversy about the website, not about what the website is supposed to be notable for.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. That is not true. The Sydney Morning Herald says, and I quote: "Sites such as www.moviesplanet.com even let you search for movie rips according to format, whether it's a Cam or a screener and what quality you want." You should read the article from Haaretz. It explicitly talks about the site itself and how moviesplanet works as a social media for movie lovers, movie database etc. Orlydumitrescu (talk) 22:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. On the Herald issue, my apologies, I must've screwed up my Find and my read of the article. Still, I don't think that's enough to establish notability; nor does the Haaretz article change my view.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.