The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mowafa Househ[edit]

Mowafa Househ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This autobiographical article does not show notability. He does not pass WP:ACADEMIC or WP:NAUTHOR or WP:ANYBIO. It fails WP:GNG. This is full of personal detail that is not supported by sources that only a WP:COI editor could add. This looks like a vanity piece. Domdeparis (talk) 08:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 09:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:19, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Effectively a CV posting by one WP:SPA Abudossari and subsequently tended by another, Mhouseh. The latter has now deleted the non-encyclopaedic material about how popular he was in this or that school class, which is an improvement, but what is left does no more than list the subject's job and research interests. Nothing provided or found indicates attained encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 07:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable person. Fails GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.