- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Mrs2Be (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable business/website. In terms of:
- WP:NCORP, there is no indication that the business (which, perhaps at peak, had between 10 and 20 employees) meets WP:ORGCRIT. Rather, as a primarily marketing business, all the coverage/mentions would seem to fall firmly within the guideline's expectation of higher requirements for marketing and public relations businesses in particular.
- WP:WEBCRIT, the subject's website doesn't seem to have (for example) been the recipient of a particular award or otherwise any more notable than any other web-based business.
- WP:SIGCOV, a search of the newspapers of record in Ireland returns very little. A search of the Irish Times for example returns just two results. Both trivial passing mentions. A search of the Irish Independent stable or local/national papers returns a bit more. However, of those, only one (the local coverage in the Wicklow People) seems to be about the subject directly. The rest are passing mentions of the subject in lifestyle or wedding supplement pieces about that industry generally. Or marketing/press-release pieces about the subject's surveys or awards.
Frankly this just seems to be an otherwise run-of-the-mill business, whose marketing efforts were perhaps somewhat more successful than others. But otherwise seems non-notable. That this article was created by a SPA/COI editor is also a concern. Guliolopez (talk) 00:12, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 00:17, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 00:17, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.