The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mulberry Chemicals[edit]

Mulberry Chemicals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article on the parent company has been deleted as non-notable (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taj Pharmaceuticals) and this subsidiary is less notable. This article was created by a confirmed sock puppet as part of an organized effort to use Wikipedia for advertising (see User:Deli nk/Taj spam campaign). Deli nk (talk) 13:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
• Delete per nomination: spam. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The IP who contested your prod is propably a sock as well btw, he then copy pasted part of a Taj document [1] into Egg powder (now a redirect again). Yoenit (talk) 16:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as creation of a banned or blocked user. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 19:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.