The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taj Pharmaceuticals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Article is about a pharmaceuticals company with no reliable sources provided and none found. I only found press releases and social media sites such as LinkedIn. I don't see how this is a notable company. TNXMan 17:47, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Astronaut is also nominating the following related pages because it is a subsidary of the company in the nominated article and the article has the same problems - no reliable sources:

Taj Agro India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lots of obvious WP:COI edits and no evidence of notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No third party evidence of notability. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - and also nominate Taj Agro India for the same reasons. Astronaut (talk) 12:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No indication that either company meets WP:CORP. The two articles are the subject of a concerted promotional effort. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive635#Organized_promotional_effort/Taj_Pharmaceuticals for details. Deli nk (talk) 19:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Sources are poor. Part of spamming attempt. Christopher Connor (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment A related article created one of the confirmed sockpuppets in this case is listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taj Api. Deli nk (talk) 18:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.