The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mutable Realms[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was tagged orphan in Feb 2009. Sole claims to fame for this ex-company was that they allegedly (and unsourcedly) were planning to release a game, which they never did and that they invented a computer gaming term which has no wikipedia entry. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 22:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 07:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't even claim notability, much less demonstrate it. A short-lived company with a proposed product that never actually came out. --MelanieN (talk) 15:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per A7. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No indication of notability. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 06:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.