The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Mystery Case Files. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 13:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery Case Files: Ravenhearst Unlocked

Mystery Case Files: Ravenhearst Unlocked (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See previous discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystery Case Files: Key to Ravenhearst. Casual game does not pass WP:GNG. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 10:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 10:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not notable. No significant coverage from reliable sources, aside from one review from Gamezebo. Newslinger (talk) 12:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Mystery Case Files, per SMcCandlish. Newslinger (talk) 05:57, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge The series appears to be notable but the individual games really are not, with maybe two possible exceptions. Almost all of these pages on the 13 or so games consist of lots and lots of moment-by-moment excessive gameplay detail, sometimes an WP:INDISCRIMINATE character list, a few reviews mentioned, and usually only one or two non-review sources at most, and usually also some empty sections (I commented one out in the nominated article). I think these could all be compressed into the Mystery Case Files article, then we'd have something that could be polished into a GA. As stand-alone pages, these serve no purpose. It's like writing individual articles about each song on the average marginally notable rock album, which a detailed verse-by-verse description of what happens in the song and who all the characters in it are even if only mentioned in one line.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  10:03, 18 July 2018 (UTC); revised: 06:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why? This is not a crime-related article.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  18:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge into Mystery Case Files, per SMcCandlish.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as per above. QueerFilmNerd^talk 17:17, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.