The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker^{talk to me} 16:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Myth World Cup[edit]

Myth World Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion Support. I think it's absolutely clear why this article should be deleted, but I'll just sum it up: First off, the article has NOTHING to underscore how or why the subject is notable. Second, none of the information is attributed to a source. Third, the vast majority of the info is original research. I think this is one of those articles that would be a great example of what WP:NOT is all about. It really makes me cringe to think that this article has existed since 2006. Eik Corell (talk) 02:18, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:02, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I might have said to merge into Myth II: Soulblighter Tournaments but there is no sourced information to merge, and almost no information period. No indication or claim of notability, but I don't think speedy would apply here. Dennis Brown (talk) 22:56, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The Myth II: Soulblighter Tournaments article seems to be more of the same. No sources, just a whole lot of what Wikipedia is not. Rhyming aside, I think taking out that article on the same grounds as this one would only be logical. Eik Corell (talk) 01:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails notability for WP:Event and part of another online tourney.--Whiteguru (talk) 22:59, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.