The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NAHBGreen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTPROMO. This is a lesser-known competitor to LEED. No independent sources, which is going to be a problem for these types of certifications. MSJapan (talk) 09:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:50, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:50, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The program meets WP:GNG. The article would benefit from copy editing to tighten it up and address some matters with tone, but it is notable. I have performed a few edits to reduce the promotional tone. Source examples include, but are not limited to those listed below. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Understanding Green Building Guidelines. W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 89–91.
The Complete Idiot's Guide to Green Building and Remodeling. Penguin. pp. 281– . (subscription required)
Prefabulous + Sustainable. Abrams.
Estimating for Residential Construction. Cengage Learning. p. 14.
The Complete Guide to Contracting Your Home. F+W Media. pp. 197–198. (subscription required)
NBC News
The Tuscaloosa News
Building Design+Construction.
Wood & Wood Products. (subscription required)

Keep per sources found by Northamerica1000. ~Kvng (talk) 13:25, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.