The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NASA Martian Bee Plan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This makes for a provocative headline due to the Black Mirror comparisons (and may meet the letter of GNG as a result) but it's one of 25 proposals NASA is evaluating at this time. There's nothing here to be the subject of an encyclopedia article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I started the article because I thought the headline was cool, but I actually don't have much of an opinion one way or the other. Adoring nanny (talk) 02:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia is not news. Also fails WP:CRYSTAL. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or draftify 125k and one out of 25 proposals, still in proposal phase, is not notable. Would need a heck of a lot of quality sources covering more than the announcement of the 125k in funding. Draftify in case it becomes notable later. Kees08 (Talk) 08:54, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the reasons given by all three above. Normally in this case I'd moot draftify, but a) there isn't much there, and most would be superceded by whatever comes out of the proposal (if anything) and b) the creator doesn't sound notably focused on the area (though I grant it is a cool headline). Nosebagbear (talk) 09:15, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. -The Gnome (talk) 22:30, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per not crystal ball. Maybe this will eventually become notable, but it isn't now. Natureium (talk) 18:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Piling on at this point, but it's WP:CRYSTAL for the time being as others have said. Things are likely to change if anything ever did go through, so I'd say draftifying isn't needed. Kingofaces43 (talk) 22:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:CRYSTAL. Septrillion (talk) 04:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.