The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NERO International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of Notability. Previous discussion did not generate a result, and present searches have revealed no additional notable references. Binarywraith (talk) 08:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per sources including Philly.com, Dragon (magazine), as well as The Boston Globe which I found in the previous AFD but did not have access to. I will try to find more, too. BOZ (talk) 11:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • A copy of the Dragon (magazine) article can be found here : https://annarchive.com/files/Drmg173.pdf, and is both 26 years old and substantially about a different organization than the present NERO International. Binarywraith (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Philly.com article also lacks any substantial information regarding Nero International, mentioning it in a single short paragraph which reads "One of the first big LARP groups formed in the United States is NERO LARP. Started in 1988 by Ford Ivey in Boston, Mass., NERO LARP is a medieval-fantasy group that currently has over 45 chapters, according to the group’s website." Binarywraith (talk) 05:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Multiple RS'es and WP:NTEMP are more compelling than the arguments for deletion. GNG is met. Jclemens (talk) 06:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  More sources: Ferndale MI Metro Times and Atlas Obscura each appear to be reliable and cover the company substantially, in the context of its products. Jclemens (talk) 06:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep has more than one RS, hence passes GNG Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.