The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 04:52, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NO ONE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable short story/web content with no evidence of notability. A Google search provides nothing that would prove the notability of this story. PROD deleted by article creator. Lugia2453 (talk) 15:53, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - given the evident COI and lack of notability with no WP:RS, this appears to be an attempt at publicity.Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No indicate of wp:notability. No wp:suitable references; actually no real references. North8000 (talk) 19:47, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No reliable sources that would show why this is notable per Wikipedia's guidelines. The story exists, but existing is not enough. We need sources that are independent of the creator, the websites he published this on, or anyone representing him. No reliable sources of this sort exist.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 20:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.