The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:59, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NRJ Ukraine[edit]

NRJ Ukraine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article has received no independent, non-trivial coverage. Thegreatgrabber (talk) ^contribs 05:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable article without reliable sources.→SeniorStar (talk) 05:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I've found coverage for it. What is the standard for radio stations to be notable? Either way it should at least be a redirect to parent company, NRJ Group. —Мандичка^YO 😜 07:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to NRJ Group#International as another of many of EU-area NRJ stations. Nate • (chatter) 04:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and then Redirect as this is in fact speedy material with such bareness and triviality and that's self-explanatory, let alone the fact there's no actual substance. SwisterTwister talk 04:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- I don't see a need to preserve the article history as the content is too trivial to bother. After delete, optionally redirect at editorial discretion if desired. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.