The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nakatomi Towers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band lacking GHits of substance and with zero GNEWS. Article references are all trivial mentions of band. Appears to fail WP:BAND. ttonyb (talk) 18:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable vanity piece that fails WP:BAND. sixtynine ^{• spill it •} 18:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I removed the CSD tag because it did not meet the criteria for A7, it did make a claim of notability (which is a much stricter requirement than WP:BAND and WP:GNG). After reviewing the references, while there are mentions of them in reliable sources like BBC and the Irish Times, I don't think I can call those few references significant coverage, and they don't meet WP:BAND. Furthermore, any predictions those news articles are making about their future performance will be in violation of WP:CRYSTAL. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 18:29, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete...to quote the article "New, Unsigned". WuhWuzDat 16:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.