The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 00:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Moytoy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Everything in this article is uncredible historical myth, and the article should be deleted. A reference notice has been up since November 2007 and none have been provided. And since the "information" within in it is not credible, none could be. Chuck Hamilton (talk) 02:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for prolonged lack of reliable sources. WillOakland (talk) 23:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and lack of reliable sources, and per nom's previous work at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moytoy I. Drmies (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This has hoax written all over it............and, in any case, no evidence of notability. Vartanza (talk) 23:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.