The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 05:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nanning No.3 High School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:GNG Uberaccount (talk) 03:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per long-standing consensus that high-schools are notable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:23, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:23, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per:

Secondary schools typically qualify on English Wikipedia for a stand-alone article. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:30, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I don't see this as a valid nomination. Where is the WP:BEFORE eg a search for sources in Chinese? We keep high schools for the very good reason that experience shows that, with enough research, sources can invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. We must avoid systemic bias and allow time for local sources to be researched. TerriersFan (talk) 00:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for my usual reasons. Verified secondary school. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:09, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.