The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

National Democrats (Norway, 1991) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This political list (not political party) stood once for election in a single municipality (albeit the capital of Norway) and gained six hundred votes. Totally minuscule, but what about RS? The article is supported by two newspaper sources, which is not enough to carry an article. However, a book exists which mentions the National Democracts (probably not accessible outside of Norway), and explains that Hege Søfteland was the only known member. The other members, if they existed, were secret. I therefore propose a merge and redirect to Hege Søfteland. Geschichte (talk) 08:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • You don't get to "vote" twice, so I struck the second "keep". What you have failed to demonstrate is that the purported sources are independent, in-depth non-trivial coverage. Keep in mind that I didn't propose deletion, but merging to the only known active member, so the information would be preserved. The book explicitly states that Erik Gjems-Onstad played a negligible role in this entity, he may have been present at the foundation meeting, but was never active. And I repeat that this political list (not political party) stood once for election in a single municipality (albeit the capital of Norway) and gained six hundred votes. Geschichte (talk) 08:47, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I had no intention of "voting" twice. The discussion was relisted and I repeated my opinion from the previous discussion. This is not a vote, this is a discussion of whether or not the article is relevant.
- Erik Gjems-Onstad was co-founder [[1]][[2]] which is not a negligible rolle. This should not be redirected to Søfteland.
- They also participated in the 1995 elections [[3]]. Then in cooperation with Stopp Innvandringen.
- Press coverage for the period 1990-1992 was significant [[4]]. They are also written about in several books although the book mentioned above is the longest and most comprehensive. Information from this source should be supplementet with other sources though.
- This is a question of expanding the article with the available sources from the books, newspapers and journals scanned by Nasjonalbiblioteket. They are available at nb.no and can be accessed by roundabout everybody resident in Norway. --regards Dyveldi ☯ prat ✉ post 09:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.