The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted (CSD G12) by SchuminWeb. NAC. Cliff Smith 19:16, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

National Network of Parents to Protect Children from Radiation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This group claims to have "275 member organizations" but when you click on the links to the "organizations" you discover most of them are just individual bloggers. So, in other words, this is a "network", or webring, of fewer than 300 blogs. An article in the Christian Science Monitor interviewed a co-founder, and they also had stray, one-line mentions in a few news articles out of the thousands of articles focusing on the Fukushima disaster, but there is no articles about any joint activities they carry out, and they don't have any Japanese Wikipedia article. I say this page cannot be any longer than a stub, is not notable, and any information that really is encyclopedic on this page should be merged into a larger page about anti-nuclear movement in Japan, probably as a one-line mention like how it is treated in the news articles cited. Shii (tock) 11:20, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Most of it is copy and pasted from the only source used. I've put it up for speedy delete. IRWolfie- (talk) 16:32, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.