The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National Press Club (New Zealand)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unverified, tagged for years, and totally promotional in tone--speedy deletion might actually apply. Not notable per GNG. Creator is arguing that this joint is as deserving as any other press club, but that's beside the point. Drmies (talk) 01:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails [[WP:GNG] NZFC^(talk) 07:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A google search turns up plenty of hits referring to people who have spoken at the club, but very little about the club itself. The article is truly awfully written and is at the least in need of serious cleanup. I note also that concerns have been expressed about the quality of the content of the National Press Club (Australia) and that is a quantum leap forward from that of the New Zealand club. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 07:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - looks like original research about a non-notable organization.--Rpclod (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.