The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep Mkativerata (talk) 20:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Native Instruments[edit]

Native Instruments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This AfD was created by Jrobinsonjunior (talk · contribs) on 31 August with no rationale. Edit summary read "Company advert. Not notable enough for Wikipedia." I am neutral and fixing/completing this nomination in accordance with WP:AGF. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:57, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep important music software co, their titles are often reviewed in major magazines! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Figmentary (talk • contribs) 21 September 2010
• Keep. They actually are a pretty "big" company in the electronic music and music technology field, and their products get quite frequent coverage in industry publications such as Electronic Musician, Mix Magazine and Sound on Sound. We seem to have some articles on their individual products such as Guitar Rig and Traktor which seem to have some sources. Some of these product articles should maybe be merged to the main company article. --KFP (contact | edits) 21:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - very well-known German electronic music company. Plenty of coverage in mags such as MixMag, Electronic Musician, etc. If you're involved in electronic music or music production, you'll know their stuff. Compare to Steinberg, Propellerhead Software, etc - Alison ^❤ 21:32, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep - No question of the company's notability in the music production world. Strange to see this one contested. AtticusX (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Major company, has received coverage in independent sources. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:13, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.