The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --jonny-mt 02:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

navicat[edit]

AfDs for this article:
    Navicat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

    This article was created by the company who develop this software. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not for marketing purposes... Frap (talk) 21:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Also-delete-them? Example:
    Mysql
    Phpmyadmin
    Sqlyog
    Microsoft_Access
    HeidiSQL
    So, I think we should keep all of them including Navicat. - Kenneth. Lv.heaven ( t / c ) — Lv.heaven (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
    Difference is that those articles where created by independent people who thought they were worthy for inclusion. navicat article was created by the developers of the software to free advertisement here to sell their shareware product. You cant be serious to to claim we should delete Microsoft Access which is done by worlds biggest software company and compare it to navicat who nobody heard of. -- Frap (talk) 02:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Those articles weren't created by their developers. This guy obviously puts his shareware software article here, so it can help him sell his software. -- Frap (talk) 02:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.