The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETEish given the low input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nearu[edit]

Nearu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial art created as a hybrid of several. No indication of notability or wide spread coverage. Typical let's invent a martial art that should have been speedied upon recreation. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I'm not seeing any indication that this is a notable martial art. It doesn't appear to be widespread or have significant practitioners. I'm also suspicious of a new martial art that was created by someone who reputedly learned it in the Himalayas from the teachings of a dead Tibetan master. I don't see significant independent coverage of this art, although I must admit Google translate didn't help me with the Persian articles. However, the titles don't appear to show significance (just lists of associations and martial artists). I'm willing to change my mind if significant independent coverage can be shown, but the burden of proof is on the article's creators. Papaursa (talk) 11:27, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.