The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy G4 by Joyous!. Tevildo 19:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neen[edit]

Neen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neen art.

This article is not an exact copy though. This one was previously tagged with PROD as "Spam / original research / neologism", endorsed, then the article creator removed the PROD without comment. This article still doesn't seem to have any good references on popularity and the article is, frankly, a mess of copy-pasted random quotes. It'd need a lot of work to get to proper quality, and doesn't really add anything that would now convince of the notability of the movement... wwwwolf (barks/growls) 20:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Also of note: Some comments were also added to the previous debate after it was closed. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 20:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Neen artists have done nothing remarkable (except spamming Wikipedia, that is). ALL of their articles are (were) of such quality. Also, I found several (>10) editors with low edit counts and main focus on neen, contemporary and surrealist art; promoting artists, websites. I think it's more than coincidence. Details later, when I have some time to look into the matter. Frigo 21:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Lots of buzz about something that is everything and yet impossible to understand what actually is. `'mikka 23:00, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete 765 ghits for "Neen art", including WP and mirrors. Smells of astroturfing for notability. Tubezone 23:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• What is all this HATE against Miltos Manetas and Neen? These people are valuable artists, they make exhibitions all over the World and they create remarkable concepts.

I want to keep the Articles about them at the Wikipedia. I am not experienced, I just started my account today because I noticed that the Neen Article disappeared and I was using it for my University Thesis (I study Art in Italy) . Would you please explain me how to contest you decision to delete the articles?

All my best

Priscilla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priscillatea (talk • contribs) — Priscillatea (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Comment If Neen Art is as popular as you suggest, then finding other sources for your thesis shouldn't be a problem, right? If you want to contest an article's deletion after it's been deleted, go toWP:DRV, deletion review. I don't hate Neen so much as I think the subject just doesn't pass notability guidelines for inclusion. Tubezone 14:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.